June 20th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
Content is King.
Web content. What is this “king” that search engines, web-savvy intellects and other industry gurus refer to? According to Lou Rosenfeld and Peter Morville in Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, content is broadly defined as the “stuff in your Web site” (second edition, page 219). While this may be a loose definition, web content can be further defined as the text, data, applications, images, video files, and audio – among other things – that make up your site. In other words, anything that is textual, visual or audible in nature can be deemed web content. While each of these should be focused on, as far as optimization goes, in order to improve a website’s results within the search engine rankings, textual content is the most viable for optimization – and a primary focus for most SEO departments in an online marketing company.
Yet, when referring to “Content is King”, “content” is implied as the written HTML text, or a derivative thereof, that is easily index-able by the search engines. So…how is this relevant to SEO? It’s relevant for a couple reasons. One being, that if a search engine can index the text available on a site quite easily, the search engines can then determine which categories, keywords, etc. that each page of a site is about.
Now, you may still inquire as to the relevancy that the content plays in optimizing for organic results…to which I continue to my second point. So, how is content useful in gaining rankings within the search engines? Easy. Since search engines use the information that they have indexed to “match up” with what a searcher seeks when querying for a certain phrase or topic, the pages of a website that have the most relevant content on that particular phrase or term (topic) will be those delivered to the searcher in the order of most related sites to least related. Therefore, the more a certain phrase is used within a page – or multiple pages – of a website, the more likely that those pages will appear in better positions of the Search Engine Results Page or SERP.
For example, I have a website that sells designer handbags. I carry some of the following designers: Prada, Louis Vuitton and Chanel. If I want to show up in the top spots for terms such as “Prada handbags”, “designer purses”, “Chanel hand bags”, etc., I better make sure that the content I place on my site includes these phrases. Keep in mind that I will also want the page of my site that features the latest Prada bags to include relevant and optimized Titles and Meta Tags featuring these keywords as well. I would not include terms that are irrelevant to the products I offer. Some examples of keywords that I would refrain from include: snowboard equipment, dog collars, picture frames. Why? Well…hopefully it’s obvious, but none of these terms have anything to do with my site or the products I offer because I only sell designer purses and handbags.
Once you understand the important role that content plays in the scheme of website optimization, you should better understand the need for your site to update its content or improve its relevancy. As one of the most important elements in reaching desirable rankings within the search engines, it is no wonder that content is king!
For further information on the do’s and don’ts of content strategy…stay tuned.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:48 am
Every day, the number of consumers that use their cell phone for browsing the web grows by leaps and bounds. Research is showing that a growing amount of cell phone internet usage is dedicated to local search and is second only to searching for sports scores or sports news. While the technology is advancing, it is still, often times, impractical to browse the internet on your cell phone for any extended period of time. Pages take longer to load than on a laptop or desktop and as a result, cell phone users don’t dig as deep into search results as the casual user at home. What does all this mean for local search? It means that if your listing isn’t located on the first or second page, it might as well not exist to a mobile browser. To capture this growing market, you must work to improve your search engine ranking or risk losing thousands of dollars in potential revenue.
You might be asking yourself, “What can I do to optimize my website and increase traffic?” Search engine optimization is a big part of the equation. Just as you would optimize your website for regular search results, there are also website optimization practices that can help you improve your rankings in local search. Below are 3 questions you should ask yourself about your website and how it relates to your ranking in the local search engines.
1. How would a user get to my store? First and foremost, make sure that your store’s address clearly labeled on every page of your website to ensure that the local search engines index as many pages as possible. A good way to do this is to embed your address into your site’s header or footer. Also, including a “Map Page” or a page with driving directions will help the search engines accurately locate your business, increasing the chances of a top ranking in the search engines.
2. Would a user want to come to my store? Do not underestimate the power of a positive review, or even a review in general. Search engines like Google and Yahoo! have reputations on the line and they want the best possible matches at the top of their listings. If the local search engines see that customers are talking about your store in a positive way, they will be more likely to move your listing up to the top of the search results.
3. Do the Search Engines know that I exist? Make sure that you sign up for a Google business account or online yellow pages listings like Info USA or NavTeq, which is where Yahoo! gathers its information from. This is an excellent opportunity to basically knock on the door of the local search engines and say “Here I am!”
Answering these 3 questions and taking steps to optimize your website is the first step towards better local search engine rankings. There are also search engine optimization companies out there who can assist you with some of the finer points of website optimization. Do not take local search for granted, especially in this day and age with mobile browsing becoming increasingly popular.

May 13th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
The benefits of strategic linking to SEO are still alive and kicking. Though it’s not the only thing needed to make high rankings, in my experience it is the most effective way to gain authority. It’s amazing how much authority goes to a site with good quality links that point to it.
It’s important not to just take any link you can lasso in. The key is to get links from sites that have similar and supporting content. For example, a good reciprocal link for a food site, would be another site that is food related. The higher the page rank on their home page, the better for you.
You’ll also want to take advantage of your title and description. It’s important to do your research for terms that you want to show up for. When you find one you see as most appropriate, make sure you don’t already rank for it. Your goal is to rank high for a term you don’t already rank for. Your description should also be optimized and supportive towards your title.
If you want to take it a step further, find out what page you will be listed on on their site, and cater your title and description to the main theme of their site and page topic.
Jennifer Kaufman
Linking Strategist

January 22nd, 2008 at 11:59 am
The folks over at Axandra.com have published a new article today about “Mosaic Cloaking” and how search engine optimizers are now using it to “game” the search engines.
Mosaic Cloaking (the basics)
It’s not much different from regular cloaking, except that instead of serving completely different pages to the search engines, clever marketers are now just serving different parts of their pages via cloaking.
For instance, you might have an E-Commerce site selling bikes. To the average visitor, you’re going to present them with a great photo, bullet list of the bikes features & an easy way for them to purchase. For the search engines, you might swap out that entire product section and fill it with an optimized article about that particular bike.
While this new Mosaic Cloaking is certainly a twist on the original, I would be willing to bet that those of us reading about it now are months (if not years) behind the game, in terms of keeping up with other SEO professionals.
This new method may work for some sites, for an undetermined amount of time, but with it now out in the light and more people talking about it, you can bet that Google and the other search engines will be creating a way to detect it and penalize those sites that are using it.
I’ve never used cloaking personally and our company, MorePro Marketing, has never employed that practice either - something I’m rather proud of. We’ve been able to acquire top search engine rankings for our clients without resorting to that level of “black hat” optimization.
January 10th, 2008 at 10:48 am
I was reading an SEO newsletter this morning and they had mentioned a number of important SEO strategies to consider when undertaking the optimization of your website on your own.
A number of the SEO tips were quite common and should be practiced by all SEO strategists, not only those working on their own sites, but also those working for agencies and an actual SEO company. Some of those tips include:
- Navigation and internal linking
- Titles & Meta tags
- Unique content
- Relevant backlinks & continuous linking programs
There were two other SEO tips that I feel are generally disregarded or not implemented on a frequent basis:
The Value Proposition (VP) issue isn’t always that easy to resolve quickly, because it takes a lot of constructive thinking in order to determine what sets your business apart from your competitors - especially how to communicate that to your potential customers. A good VP can make a world of difference on how your website converts visitors to sales (or leads).
The other item was the “Code bloat / Site download time”, which I strongly feel is overlooked on a regular basis.
The concept is simple… reduce the size of your pages (code & images) and they’ll load faster, enabling better usability from your site visitors, as well as allowing the search engines to spider your pages more quickly. There are a number of rather easy ways to reduce your code bloat & increase your website’s download speed:
- Convert all inline JavaScript to external files and call them as separate files
- Convert embedded font styles & formatting to an external CSS file and reference it as a separate file
- Optimize the size of the images on your pages - For some industries/markets, having crystal clear images is important and those visitors should be willing to wait a few more seconds. For most industries, however, they’re not going to wait, so your fancy, slow loading image is actual a friction point that will hurt your chances of converting that visitor.
There’s nothing that I’ve mentioned here that’s “new” - it’s common knowledge. Use these SEO tips on your website and you’ll see improved results.
June 28th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
In an article published in the SEO-News newsletter this morning, Kanga Internet’s Chris Diprose details 10 of the most common SEO mistakes that you’re bound to make on your website. Whether or not the mistakes are done on purpose, are done because of a lack of SEO knowledge, or you had someone else build your site - these SEO mistakes should be avoided. Some of the mistakes that Chris mentions were covered back in January, when we published our “Common SEO Blunders… Must read for web designers” post.
If you find that you’re guilty of any of these mistakes, take the action now to correct them so you can start improving your search engine rankings.
Here are Chris’ Top 10 SEO Mistakes:
- Bad Titles
- Filename of the Page
- Duplicate or Bad Content
- No Links
- Incoming Link Anchor Text
- Bad Internal Page Links
- Live Links
- Impatience
- Keyword Selection
- Keyword Spamming and Stuffing
I certainly don’t have any objections to the list that Chris prepared. I might rank Impatience (#8) higher on the list, only because becoming impatient with your SEO can lead to more problems down the road. You’re more likely to try an SEO tactic that’s untested or engage in some type of questionable SEO practice if you don’t plan out your strategy properly and if you don’t give it time to work.
1. Bad Titles
A survey of top SEO professonals on SEOMoz.org a couple months ago ranked the Title tag as the most important aspect of SEO, so it only makes sense that bad titles are probably the worst mistake you can make when optimizing your website.
2. Filename of Pages
This one is a little off-base, at least in naming the mistake. This should be URL structure or “dynamic URLs vs. static URLs”. Certainly, having a site with long, dynamic URLs is a problem. Use Mod_rewrite or the Windows equivalent to rewrite your URLs to be more friendly. This is not a necessity unless your URLs have more than 2-3 variables on the query string in my opinion. We’ve had plenty of experience and success w/ single variable query string URLs.
3. Duplicate Content
We’ve covered this topic several times in the past and it’s probably one of the hardest mistakes to effectively communicate to site owners and content managers. They just don’t see the value of writing unique content for their products or their stores, when they can get a completed data feed from the manufacturer and plop it right into the site… unfortunately, that just won’t yield any long-term results.
4. No Links
This is a no-brainer… a site cannot rank on content alone. Every website should have an ongoing backlink strategy.
5. Incoming Anchor Link Text
See previous mistake… Just make sure your backlinks use keywords. Many site owners and marketers will try to use the company’s name and/or just the domain name as the anchor text. This is much less effective than using keyword-rich anchor text on all backlinks. Be sure to vary the keywords also - your incoming links (backlinks) shouldn’t all be the same.
6. Bad Internal Page Links
A site w/ poor navigation or linking structure will struggle to compete with sites who have good navigation and structure. Be sure to categorize your pages properly and to use keywords in the anchor text. Another common problem w/ internal page links is the use of images for navigation instead of text - always go w/ text unless you already have a full text menu elsewhere on the page.
7. Live Links
Broken links hurt… check your site frequently to make sure you’re links aren’t broken. If you find broken links, fix them ASAP. Setup a custom 404 error page if you have pages that no longer exist and if you can’t get the links changed (from backlinks for example).
8. Impatience
This can kill an SEO campaign. Do the work and use the methods that have been proven to work over time. Allow sufficient time for all the work you’ve done to take affect (several months).
9. Keyword Selection
Selecting the wrong keywords is almost as bad as not selecting keywords at all. Be sure that you’re optimizing for the keywords your target audience is using, not the keywords you think they are (yes, there is usually a difference). Use keyword research tools like Keyword Discovery, Wordtracker or Google Trends to find out what your visitors are using, what’s most popular, and what keywords are slowly fading into oblivion.
10. Keyword Spamming and Stuffing
This is just plain dumb… Your website shouldn’t be stuffed with keywords you are targeting, let alone keywords you’re not (that’s a whole other story). Common keyword stuffing takes place in site footers, comment tags, meta tags or other typically hidden areas of the site and/or the HTML coding itself.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Interview snippets from Vanessa Fox, Product Manager for Google Webmaster Tools. Full video interview w/ Rand Fishkin
I’ve tried to get the important points from the interview, so several of these items are very short and/or are specific statements made by Google’s Vanessa Fox.
Sitemaps.org initiatives
Webmaster Tools & Sitemaps
- Yahoo Site Explorer out of Beta.
- URL removal tool in Google (out fo 6 yrs now). Could make it’s way into Webmaster Tools.
- Real-time Google PageRank coming soon? Doesn’t sound like it (too many privacy issues).
- Google Supplemental Results - could start providing more information on why pages are in the Supplemental Index, but likely wouldn’t provide a full list of everything in the index. Not considered such a bad thing anymore - many supplemental results still rank well for specific phrases.
- Considering offering data on who’s linking to your 404 error pages and/or where your broken links are being linked from. Always try to redirect to the most relevant page on the site vs. using a 404.
- Could submitting an orphan page through Sitemaps get a page indexed?
Yes… (but) it probably wouldn’t rank well. That means that all of the pages on a site should be submitted through Sitemaps.
- Google Link Reporting - Link sorting (currently alphabetized).
Could make other options available in the future.
- Sounds like they could be adding features to allow you to verify more than one domain within your account (ie: multiple domains).
- Moving your website to another domain - Take pages from old site, move to new site (as is). Don’t restructure or re-design the website until after you’re sure the engines see the new domain & pages well. “Do things in stages” or “one step at a time”.
Pre-Sell Pages (ie: .edu hosted content)
- They’re aware of what’s going on and could devalue some of the trust that certain domains have (ie: .edu, .gov). “Always looking for ways to do things better.” Hoping to get some changes in the hopper and to see some changes soon.One example given was searching for “viagra” in Google - several of the Top 10 results are .edu sites that appear to have had content hosted on them. Several of the pages have custom 404 error pages coming up, so they must have figured out what was going on. Another appears to be forum/comment spam that’s somehow ranked well (???).
Buying Links (watch out!)
- Might make webmasters aware of detection of paid links (ouch!!!). The more information the better, including problems regarding ranking issues. No definitive answer though….
Sites Displaying Search Results (scrapers, shopping sites, etc.)
- She mentioned that the engines, in some cases, wouldn’t want visitors searching in Google to click a result, only to find another page of search results. I guess some filters could be expected.
Google Base
- Submit structured data (ie: feeds).
- Separate searching system from Google.com.
- Good for experimenting - “get in early”.
Google News
- Can submit News sitemap through Webmaster Tools.
- Send email to get included (for review) - English only.
In case you missed our last Vanessa Fox posting, you can view her December 2006 interview here.
February 28th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
Yahoo has finally wised up and implemented support for a new Meta robots tag that will allow you to “opt-out” from having your Yahoo! Directory title and description show up in the search results.
The tag is called “NOYDIR” or No Yahoo Directory, and can be used as follows:
meta name=”robots” content=”NOYDIR”
or the less common
meta name=”slurp” content=”NOYDIR”
The 2nd tag being specifically for Yahoo’s spider “Slurp“.
This is great news for site owners who feel like they’ve been handcuffed by the Yahoo! Directory editors and their minimally optimized directory listings.
February 23rd, 2007 at 11:00 am
Site Reference has a good article about “Optimizing for MSN: Is it worth the effort?”. In short, yes it’s worth it.
While there’s no argument about the higher quality of results that Google provides, MSN is still a valuable search engine when it comes to getting visitors that are going to purchase something from you or fill out your lead form.
The article makes a few points about what makes MSN’s results different from Google’s:
What about MSN? In this case, things tend to be a little smoother. MSN seems to really like new pages, and it has no sandbox. It doesn’t use an “age filter” and classifies sites much faster. Therefore, it is highly probable that the amount of results that a Web user might get for a given search to be significantly higher than the one obtained from Google. Also, it appears that the search speed is higher with MSN than with Google. This may be because their index is considerably smaller than Google’s.
The biggest difference between the two engines is obviously the sandbox effect and the fact that MSN’s Live Search tends to rank newer or recently updated pages more favorably. Not to mention they pick up your incoming links a lot quicker and calculate the link weight in their algorithm much faster.
Ok, so that doesn’t explain the issue of getting visitors to buy from you or to contact you for services. They go on to detail that the conversion rates for MSN are much higher than from Google. It’s believed that Google users are more prone to looking at many sites very quickly, while MSN users are likely to stay and complete a desired action for you.
Reports show that Google is already a saturated search engine. Its users see so many websites that they don’t have the patience to spend much time on any given site, but still want to visit others as quickly as possible. On the other hand, it appears that MSN users are more likely to produce conversions (sales). This probability is 48% higher for MSN users than for any other Internet users.
Based on this information, optimizing for MSN is very important to any business. Unfortunately, the same optimization strategies that you use for Google or Yahoo may not help you in MSN.
Here are some of the key strategies to improving your MSN rankings:
- Create a large site, full of valuable, well organized, and resourceful content.
- MSN is a little more vulnerable to higher keyword density; be careful about increasing yours, however, because Google is adept at identifying spam (& possibly applying a penalty).
- MSN is more vulnerable to quantity (spamming) than the other engines, since they tend to count new pages & links more quickly. This is a pretty easy concept - add a lot of links, move up in MSN.
- Ensure you site is clean, coding-wise.
- Have a well optimized Title tag
While it might seem like a good idea to start doing all these things to optimize your site for MSN, keep in mind that some of these strategies could get you in trouble in the others (Google & Yahoo).
Additional resources on MSN optimization:
http://www.seochat.com/c/b/MSN-Optimization-Help/
http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=4691
http://ezinearticles.com/?MSN-Optimization-at-a-Glance&id=142141
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum97/240.htm
February 15th, 2007 at 10:20 am
The two biggest stories the past few weeks related to internet marketing and SEO are probably the new tools that Google and Yahoo both rolled out.
Google unveils more links
Within your Google Webmaster Tools account, you can now view/download a much larger scope of incoming links to your website. In addition, you can view the links to specific pages on your site and generate an outgoing link report as well. Here’s the official word from Vanessa Fox over at GWT:
You asked, and we listened: We’ve extended our support for querying links to your site to much beyond the link: operator you might have used in the past. Now you can use webmaster tools to view a much larger sample of links to pages on your site that we found on the web. Unlike the link: operator, this data is much more comprehensive and can be classified, filtered, and downloaded. All you need to do is verify site ownership to see this information. Read the full story
I’ve tested the new link reports out and it doesn’t give you too much information that you probably don’t already have. In addition, Matt Cutts stated that the reports are by no means 100% of the data available and don’t reflect the true number of links pointing to your site. He also stated that just because a link is showing up in the report, that it’s not an indicator that the link is counted in the algorithm - it’s a simple report of the links, nothing more.
Yahoo Pipes unveiled
The general scope of “Yahoo Pipes” is the ability to combine RSS/feeds (or mash them together), and then manipulate the data in a way that’s useful for you or your website(s). It’s basically an RSS masher & re-hasher. The “pipes” name comes from the Unix pipes that let you combine commands (foreign to this writer).
What Is Pipes? Pipes is a hosted service that lets you remix feeds and create new data mashups in a visual programming environment. The name of the service pays tribute to Unix pipes, which let programmers do astonishingly clever things by making it easy to chain simple utilities together on the command line. Read the full story
Nice link from Yahoo Pipes btw… what, you couldn’t figure out how to use Mod Rewrite?